
What the WHO Arts and Health Review Means for Work with Adults 50+
Research review
In 2019 the World Health Organization’s Regional Office for Europe published a report that many people in arts and health still treat as their starting point: What is the evidence on the role of the arts in improving health and well-being? A scoping review. It was written by Daisy Fancourt and Saoirse Finn. Here we look at what they studied, how, what they found – and what it means for cultural mediators working with older adults.
What was studied
The question was simple: what does the research literature say about the effect of the arts on physical and mental health? The arts were understood broadly, in five groups: performing arts; visual arts, design and craft; literature; culture (such as museums, galleries and concerts); and online, digital and electronic arts. Gardening and cooking were left out – creative, yes, but not usually counted as arts.
How it was studied
A scoping review does not test one intervention. It maps an entire field. The authors searched publications in English and Russian from January 2000 to May 2019. They identified more than 900 publications, including over 200 reviews and meta-analyses that together cover more than 3,000 studies. Systematic reviews were prioritised, but individual studies and some grey literature were also included.
What was found
The findings fall into two broad areas: prevention and health promotion, and management and treatment of illness. Several points stand out for anyone working with people over 50.
• Loneliness and connection. The report calls the arts “a recognized way of reducing loneliness and social isolation”. Dance, arts classes and theatre have been linked to greater social inclusion for people living with dementia and their carers.
• Mental health. Arts engagement is associated with lower stress and daily anxiety, and with a lower risk of depression in later life.
• Cognition. Cultural engagement is linked to “cognitive reserve”. Regular visits to museums, galleries, theatres or concerts in older age are associated with slower cognitive decline and a lower risk of developing dementia. For people already experiencing decline, some studies found benefits from painting or dance classes.
• Frailty. Dance is linked to better balance and strength. Evidence on preventing falls is mixed.
• Carers. Shared arts activities improved communication and closeness between carers and the people they support, and groups offered respite. Singing, drumming or listening to music reduced carers’ anxiety and stress.
The policy considerations come in three strands: support arts interventions where the evidence is strong (arts for people with dementia are named as one example); make culturally diverse arts accessible across the life course; and strengthen collaboration between culture, social care and health – for instance through social prescribing.
Limitations
The authors are open about the uneven quality of the evidence. Some results have not been replicated, and some large studies found no benefit. Much of the evidence on healthy ageing comes from observational studies. That shows association, not necessarily cause: healthier, better-off people may simply visit museums more often. A scoping review also does not appraise each study as strictly as a systematic review would. And the literature only runs to mid-2019.
What this means for cultural mediators
Choose your words carefully. The report is a strong argument in a funding bid or a conversation with a care home manager. But avoid saying that museums “prevent dementia”. More accurate: regular cultural engagement is associated with slower cognitive decline.
Think in series, not one-offs. Most positive associations concern repeated participation. A short series of sessions is often more meaningful than a single event.
Bring carers in as participants. The review points to benefits for those who care, too. A session where the partner or relative takes part – rather than just accompanying – can be a genuine break.
Find partners. The third strand is about working across sectors. For a library, museum or community centre, that is an invitation to talk to GPs, social workers and care providers.
Record what happens. Gaps in the evidence are also an opportunity. A simple mood scale before and after a session, plus participants’ own words, helps you and the wider field.
Sources
• Fancourt, D. and Finn, S. (2019). What is the evidence on the role of the arts in improving health and well-being? A scoping review. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe (Health Evidence Network synthesis report 67).
• Arts and Health Ireland. Report overview.
Image source: https://unsplash.com/photos/three-older-men-in-blue-blazers-singing-indoors-IpHb_kv_b2k
The Legacy of Meet Me at MoMA: What Worked and What Europe Can Adopt
Case study
Ask cultural mediators about museum programmes for people living with dementia and one name comes up almost every time: Meet Me at MoMA. Developed by the Museum of Modern Art in New York, it became a reference point for many museums worldwide. The MeWell site already offers practical guides drawing on MoMA’s materials. This piece takes a different angle: what actually worked, what the evaluations show, and how the model has taken root in Europe.




























