The Legacy of Meet Me at MoMA: What Worked and What Europe Can Adopt
Case study
Ask cultural mediators about museum programmes for people living with dementia and one name comes up almost every time: Meet Me at MoMA. Developed by the Museum of Modern Art in New York, it became a reference point for many museums worldwide. The MeWell site already offers practical guides drawing on MoMA’s materials. This piece takes a different angle: what actually worked, what the evaluations show, and how the model has taken root in Europe.
Who, where, when and for whom
MoMA was already running programmes for people with Alzheimer’s disease and their care partners when, from 2007 to 2014, its Department of Education ran a special initiative, the MoMA Alzheimer’s Project, funded by the MetLife Foundation. It had two aims: to expand the museum’s own programme, and to create training resources for arts and health professionals elsewhere.
The programme is for people living with dementia together with a family member or carer. Crucially, they come as a pair, and both are participants.
How it works
The format is simple. Once a month a group meets in the galleries for an hour and a half. Specially trained educators talk with participants about themes, artists and exhibitions. In MoMA’s own words, the programme “provides a forum for dialogue through looking at art”. The focus is not on facts and dates but on what people see, feel and remember in the moment.
The programme is still running. MoMA’s calendar lists monthly sessions; the next one is on 22 October 2026. They are free, but places are limited and registration is required.
The project also left a body of knowledge. In 2009 it published Meet Me: Making Art Accessible to People with Dementia, with guides for museums, care organisations and families, plus art modules. It is free online, with a Spanish edition. Between 2007 and 2014 MoMA reached more than 10,500 colleagues through conference presentations and training workshops.
Results
In 2008 researchers Mary Mittelman and Cynthia Epstein from New York University evaluated the programme with 37 people in the early stages of dementia and 37 family carers. Key findings:
• mood improved significantly in both groups after the visit, and nobody left less happy than they arrived;
• carers reported better emotional wellbeing;
• 92.5% of carers planned to come back;
• in focus groups, participants said the programme temporarily eased their isolation;
• participants named the educators’ style as the most valuable element.
The researchers were clear about the limits: the sample was small, and the questionnaire was too long for people with dementia. They called for a larger, longer-term study.
In 2011 Audience Focus surveyed 66 staff from 33 museums that had started similar programmes. Most took place in the galleries and centred on conversation about art. Almost all museums worked with their local Alzheimer’s Association, and most funded the work from education budgets. Over time, the conversational teaching style spread to work with other audiences.
How the model took root in Europe
The clearest example is in Germany. From 2014 to 2016 Goethe University Frankfurt and the Städel Museum ran the ARTEMIS study, which researchers explicitly linked to Meet Me at MoMA. They extended the format: an hour of conversation in the galleries was followed by an hour of art-making in the studio. Groups had up to six couples, meeting weekly for six weeks. In a randomised study with 44 couples, researchers recorded improved wellbeing after every session, better quality of life, and fewer signs of apathy and low mood.
In Austria, the University for Continuing Education Krems and Vienna’s Kunsthistorisches Museum run the project Gesundes Museum (“Healthy Museum”). The target group is different: people around 60 and over who rarely visit museums, sometimes feel lonely or worry about their memory. They are offered a free series of four themed visits.
In Lithuania, the public broadcaster LRT featured the programme Susitikimas muziejuje (“Meeting at the Museum”) in 2024, in which people with dementia and their relatives look at art together.
What Lithuania, Austria and Malta can adopt
The pair as the unit. MoMA and ARTEMIS both invite the person with dementia and their relative together. That creates a shared positive experience – and a break for the carer.
Regularity. A monthly or weekly rhythm builds trust in a way a one-off event cannot.
Partnership from day one. US museums almost always worked with an Alzheimer’s association. In Lithuania, Austria or Malta the equivalent might be a dementia association, a care home or a social services centre.
Training, not just a programme. The key success factor was the educator’s style. Invest in training and supervision for mediators.
Adapt rather than copy. ARTEMIS added art-making; Krems added a preventive focus. In smaller towns, or across Malta’s islands, the programme could also travel to care homes.
Sources
- MoMA. The MoMA Alzheimer’s Project.
- MoMA. Meet Me at MoMA: research and evaluation resources.
- Mittelman, M. and Epstein, C. (2008). Meet Me at MoMA evaluation (NYU).
- MoMA. Meet Me at MoMA – event page.
- Seifert, K. (2020). A research overview of three recent art intervention and therapy projects targeted at patients living with dementia. GMS Journal of Arts Therapies, 2.
- Culture for Health. ARTEMIS – Art Encounters: Museum Intervention Study.
- University for Continuing Education Krems. Gesundes Museum (leaflet).
- LRT Mediateka. Susitikimas su… demencija (2024).
- Image source: Photo by cool guy jon on Unsplash

What the WHO Arts and Health Review Means for Work with Adults 50+
Research review
In 2019 the World Health Organization’s Regional Office for Europe published a report that many people in arts and health still treat as their starting point: What is the evidence on the role of the arts in improving health and well-being? A scoping review. It was written by Daisy Fancourt and Saoirse Finn. Here we look at what they studied, how, what they found – and what it means for cultural mediators working with older adults.




























